
Last 4 earnings calls · through Q2 FY2026
The bull case is that TAVR demand is expanding as treatment moves earlier, so guidance has risen at every call as evidence reaches more patients.
A reopened Medicare coverage review and faster referral of aortic stenosis patients could widen the treated population well beyond current forecasts.
Cash generation exceeds what the business needs, so factory capacity, small acquisitions and buybacks are funded internally, which lifts earnings per share over time.
The bear case is that most revenue still comes from one procedure, so hospital capacity, reimbursement policy and a single competitor set the growth rate.
Recent growth also leaned on a competitor leaving Europe, a one-time benefit that has now run out just as year-over-year comparisons become harder in the second half.
The failed acquisition and a moderate-disease trial that has not read out leave the next leg of growth uncertain and largely outside current guidance.
Operating margin gains lean on spending timing and cost discipline while gross margin has not improved, so further expansion depends on revenue scale.
In short: TAVR guidance keeps rising and new mitral and tricuspid products are scaling, but comparisons get harder.
Management now expects faster TAVR growth than it did a year ago, which supports the claim that earlier treatment and the asymptomatic label are widening the market rather than only shifting share.
TMTT revenue reached $199 million in the quarter, 11% of segment revenue, and management raised its 2026 sales range for the group, giving Edwards several independent ways to grow in mitral and tricuspid disease.
Physicians are ordering more echocardiograms and referring patients sooner, which adds new patients to the treatment pool instead of only moving existing ones through the system faster.
Edwards describes the second quarter of 2026 as the last with benefit from a rival leaving Europe, so TAVR growth from here must come from procedure expansion and share gains against the competitors that remain.
Edwards pursued JenaValve specifically to reach aortic regurgitation patients; with the deal closed out and related charges booked, that growth option must be rebuilt internally or bought again.
The PROGRESS trial tests TAVR in a patient group management says is at least as large as severe disease, but the data are not out, so a further TAVR indication is not yet in the forecast.
In short: Operating margin and free cash flow are strong, while gross margin has stalled and the tax rate is rising.
Operating margin was 29.5% in the second quarter of 2026, up 2.6 points, and management targets 50 to 100 basis points a year; the 2026 step-up is flattered by dropping planned JenaValve spending.
Free cash flow of $1.4 billion over the last twelve months equals 22% of revenue, funding factory capacity for new valves and about $1.5 billion of remaining buyback authorization without borrowing.
Gross margin was 77.5% in the second quarter of 2026, and management expects the full year at the bottom of its range because of currency hedging and the cost of manufacturing newly launched therapies.
Pillar Two rules and a California limit on research credits push the effective tax rate to the high end of the guided range, absorbing part of the operating gain before it reaches earnings per share.
In short: SAPIEN leads TAVR with the deepest durability data, but growth depends on reimbursement and procedure volumes.
A year ago management was asking CMS to reopen the national coverage decision; a draft now exists with a pathway for asymptomatic coverage and a final policy expected in September, which could ease access from 2027.
Seven-year PARTNER 3 and ten-year PARTNER 2 data let Edwards argue that valve durability and lifetime management favor its platform, which is the basis for defending price against lower-priced rivals.
Edwards is still working to win back ground in Japan after competitors entered, showing that leadership in an individual country can erode even while the global franchise grows.
TAVR is 72% of segment revenue, so company results depend on one procedure, one Medicare coverage policy and one competitive position in aortic stenosis.