
Last 4 earnings calls · through Q2 FY2026
The bull case is that Homes.com members earn far more in commissions than they pay in subscription fees, so retention and pricing can rise together.
Most revenue is recurring subscriptions on annual contracts with high renewal rates, giving the company a predictable base to fund new products and markets.
Residential operations have crossed into profit and management has laid out a path that reduces its Homes.com spending every year through the end of the decade.
CoStar, LoopNet and the newer debt and lease benchmarking products each add a growth layer on top of a commercial property market that is recovering.
The bear case is that bookings growth has stalled, which shows up later in slower revenue and undercuts the case for the enlarged sales organization.
Apartment owners are under vacancy stress and a competitor is discounting heavily, so the company must trade away price to defend its share of rooftops.
The Homes.com push is being reworked from headcount growth to per-rep productivity, which pushes revenue out and suggests the original plan overshot.
Growth now leans on Domain, Matterport and Zonda, bringing integration, dilution and goodwill risk that is hard to see in the reported segments.
In short: Homes.com and new data products are growing fast, but bookings have slowed and revenue guidance was cut.
Management reports more than 36,000 agent subscribers, most on annual contracts, and is raising prices for new members after documenting member returns. A larger, longer-lived subscriber base is what makes the Homes.com investment pay back.
Rent Benchmark, CoStar France, U.K. public record search and AI lease abstraction all went live, with CoStar Australia due later this year. Each adds subscription revenue on top of an existing sales force and data set.
Net new bookings rose just 3% from the first quarter, a pace that does not support the revenue acceleration management has promised. Bookings convert to revenue over subsequent quarters, so a flat trend limits 2027 growth.
One quarter ago management reaffirmed its revenue range; it now expects less, citing Ten-X, fewer Homes.com reps and price discipline at Apartments.com. Cutting the top line while holding profit guidance means the growth plan slipped.
In short: Profit and cash flow are rising fast as costs are held flat, while Homes.com spending still weighs on margins.
The full-year adjusted EBITDA range rose to $780 million to $820 million from $740 million to $800 million, and management expects the highest profit in company history. The increase came from personnel and operating cost savings rather than from revenue.
Operating margin reached 8.2% against a loss in the same quarter a year earlier. That swing shows the heavy spending phase of the Homes.com brand launch is behind the company and profit can scale with revenue.
Diluted shares rose 5.8% between fiscal 2022 and fiscal 2025, so per-share gains trailed total profit growth. Buybacks only began in 2025 and must keep running to offset acquisition-related share issuance.
Management still guides to a $550 million net investment in Homes.com for 2026 and weights marketing to the first half. Reported margins therefore stay uneven quarter to quarter even as the full-year figure improves.
In short: Apartment leads convert better than rivals, but discounting rivals and single-source suppliers are risks.
Third-party analysis finds Apartments.com leads convert to leases at 2.5 times the next closest competitor. That conversion advantage is why management can keep pricing roughly flat while a rival discounts to buy share.
The FTC and several state attorneys general are suing Zillow over its rental advertising agreement. A ruling against the rival could unwind a partnership that CoStar competes against directly in multifamily advertising.
Apartment vacancy is elevated and a rival is pricing aggressively, so Apartments.com is accepting slower revenue growth and lower average revenue per property to protect its rate card. That trade limits growth in its most profitable marketplace.
Matterport relies on a limited number of component suppliers, some in China, for its cameras. Tariffs or a supply interruption would slow hardware sales and the subscriptions that come attached to each camera.