
Last 4 earnings calls · through Q2 FY2026
The bull case is that demand for the platform outruns Palantir's ability to serve it, so results keep beating the outlook management set only months earlier.
Growth comes mostly from U.S. commercial customers who start with one use case and then expand across the enterprise, so revenue rises from accounts Palantir already has.
Because customers build the ontology into daily operations, the bull side argues that replacing Palantir costs more than expanding with it, which supports pricing.
The bear case is that growth depends on the United States, while other regions buy slowly and require buyers to choose foreign software over domestic vendors.
Much of the revenue comes from government programs whose funding depends on appropriations, so award timing rather than demand can decide how fast revenue grows.
Adjusted profit measures exclude stock paid to employees, so the share count keeps rising while some hosting obligations add cost to serving government customers.
In short: Growth keeps accelerating and guidance is raised repeatedly, but nearly all of it now comes from the U.S.
Commercial revenue reached $945 million in the quarter, up about 110% from a year earlier, and customers who begin with one use case keep adding workloads.
International commercial revenue was $182 million in the quarter, up 26% from a year earlier, so the company's growth rate rests heavily on a single country.
Management expects a continuing resolution because that has been the norm for most of the company's life, and a stopgap delays the new awards that drive the government segment.
In short: Margins and free cash flow are very high, but stock-based pay keeps adding shares.
The business converts most of its revenue into cash while spending almost nothing on capital, which pays for hiring and buybacks without borrowing.
Gross margin was 84.7% as Palantir absorbed hosting costs for one government customer, a contract structure that trades margin for faster deployment and tighter customer ties.
In short: Customers treat AIP as the default for production AI, but revenue leans on a few large accounts.
Same customer, same models and same timeline, but AIP and forward deployed engineers produced a contract the lab could not, which is the competitive claim Palantir sells against model providers.
A year ago the pitch centered on models commoditizing cognition; now Palantir sells customers control of their weights and data, which shifts what it competes on and who it competes with.
The top three customers were 16% of 2025 revenue, so losing one account or a change in one agency's priorities moves the whole growth rate.