
Last 4 earnings calls · through Q2 FY2026
The bull case rests on Nasdaq becoming a subscription vendor, with recurring solutions revenue dominating the mix and growing faster than the rest of the company.
Its listing and index franchises reinforce each other: landmark IPOs deepen the pool of companies whose shares track Nasdaq benchmarks and pay asset-based fees.
Management is turning regulatory approvals on extended trading hours and tokenized shares into dated launches, which bulls treat as real revenue potential.
Much of the recent acceleration came from asset values and trading volumes rather than pricing, so revenue would slow if markets fell or volumes normalized.
The financial-crime enterprise push is signed but slow to install, so revenue keeps arriving later than management's earlier comments implied.
Expense guidance has been raised more than once this year and the share count is higher than before the Adenza deal, so per-share gains rely on revenue outrunning both.
Trading revenue depends on volume and on a fee capture rate that new off-exchange venues keep pressing, so growth there is only partly within management's control.
In short: Solutions revenue grows fast, but financial-crime deals install slowly and index fees track market levels.
Landmark listings such as SpaceX raise Nasdaq's standing with issuers and feed listing fees, index inclusion and data sales, so a strong IPO year compounds across divisions.
A year ago management described tokenization as a staged experiment with no timetable; it now points to a Kraken-linked launch early next year and a Nasdaq token design, which would add a new settlement-related revenue line.
Management once expected large Verafin signings to lift revenue within a quarter or two; it now says installation runs about a year, so growth from last year's record signings keeps sliding to the right.
In short: Margins and cash flow are strong, but expense guidance keeps rising and share count grew with Adenza.
Consistent beats reflect a business where recurring revenue arrives ahead of cost, and management has kept the gap between solutions growth and expense growth intact.
Leverage is near the target range and first-half repurchases already exceeded all of last year, so management can keep returning cash while still funding product investment.
In January management set a 2026 cost range it has since lifted twice, so the cost base grows alongside revenue and operating leverage depends on the top line holding.
Shares outstanding rose 16.2% over three years, so per-share profit must outgrow net income; buybacks are only now beginning to offset that issuance.
In short: Nasdaq leads in listings and index products, but trading fees face off-exchange pressure and volume cycles.
A year ago the launch depended on regulatory approval; the SEC has since cleared it and management targets December, adding trading hours and more demand for Nasdaq market data.
Two more large distributors now sell Nasdaq-100 products on the same fee terms as QQQ, which extends the index's reach without conceding pricing to competitors.
New consolidators and cheaper order flow lower what Nasdaq earns per contract, so record volumes produce less revenue per trade and the division depends on volume staying high.
Between 2001 and 2004 revenue dropped 37% and the operating margin fell to 1.5%, a reminder that listings, trading and asset-based fees can decline at the same time.